Big numbers have been released by comScore about the growing number of online videos served by both Facebook and YouTube. Between the two sites, they delivered more than 24 billion views in August alone. To get down to the specifics. comScore’s executive chairman said that Facebook had delivered a billion, yes that’s billion, more video views than YouTube, and Facebook itself announced in September that it was delivering a billion views a day. Welcome to Q4 and the potential for massive advertising spend.
What do those big numbers mean for the advertising industry? Well, if you listen to the networks, not much.
In a June 2014 report, RBC Capital Markets analyst David Bank stated “the online video market poses little threat to the traditional network TV ecosystem.” To highlight the drastic contrast between the two markets, Banks asserted the advertising value of an entire week of YouTube viewership is equivalent to that of a single, first-run episode of CBS sitcom “The Big Bang Theory.”
“Is ‘The Big Bang Theory’ a big show? Yes,” said Bank. “Does its scale threaten the fabric of the rest of the TV advertising ecosystem? We do not think so.”
A “Big Bang” viewer sits through around eight minutes of advertising, while a YouTube viewer is exposed to far shorter, less frequent pre-roll ads, some of which can be skipped. Moreover, Bank noted, only around 16 percent of ad minutes in online video run against premium content, and roughly half of that inventory is available on properties owned by major media companies like CBS or ABC.
So more and longer ads make TV superior, even when run against mediocre content? But how engaged is the TV viewer vs. the video viewer? Video viewers may be exposed to fewer ads, but they can’t fast forward through as much advertising as TV viewers can since the advent of time-shifted viewing. Morevoer, Facebook serves autoplay video ads, although some users dislike that because they almost HAVE to view them. Does that produce positive engagement with a brand? We’d say it depends on the brand. The jury’s still out on the overall effect.
But here are better ways to serve video advertising than just pre-roll on two sites. For one thing, we believe video ads can be cut loose from pre-roll and served on non-video sites where they can run in the middle of content a visitor is already reading. Our inArticle format does not run auto-play sound, so we’re courteous to a reading visitor. But we don’t let the visitor forget either, because we leave a 1×1 copy of the ad at the bottom of the page, so if a visitor wants to read all the way through the content and return to the ad, she can.
We’ve also got a Tier 1 network at your disposal, so if you want to buy video ads and you can’t find enough pre-roll to scale your campaign, our ZINC high impact formats could be perfect for you.
Ad Request Event for VAST
As the digital video advertising market becomes more sophisticated, new features and functionality are required to improve support for streaming ad display and reporting. We have added a new feature Ad Request which works in VAST Events.
The ‘Ad Request’ feature is activated by default for all VAST ads that are created, it will not be available in the VAST Compatible create ad form. The Ad Requests event reports on the number of requests made by the VAST tag to the ad server to fetch the video ad.
Users can view the Ad requests logged for an ad by pulling a VAST event report.
Click here for more information
Reach Report by Channel/Country ( Not yet released)
Apart from existing Campaign and Creative reach report, you can now pull a reach report by Country and Channel. The Country and Channel reach report is available along with all the existing parameters and can be pulled by month, week or day.
These reports will allow you to analyze how effective your reach is for a Country and Channel.
Frequency cap option for expandable
Expandable ads are rich media ads that can expand beyond the original size of the ad unit. The ad can expand automatically or when a user clicks or rolls over, and you can control that setting when you traffick the Ad in Zedo Server. However Auto expanding multiple times in a day for the same user, could create a negative impact. Hence to keep this in check we now provide frequency capping option that allows you to decide the number of times the Ad will Auto Expand in a day for a specific user.
Roadblock and Competing ad setup improved
We have improved the Roadblock and Competing ad setup by eliminating the steps to create pages by synchronizing the channels. You can now targeting roadblock ads directly to any channel and serve the ads on your webpage.
Ad status while creating an ad
You can now set a new ad to app (approved) status directly from the create ad form.
Nobody wants the publishing industry to go away, but current conditions sure make it difficult for it to survive. It used to be that advertisers had to come to publishers to reach potential customers. Now, however, all kinds of tech companies sell customer data, and the publisher’s audience appears to have become less critical to the targeting process. Thus, there has been an almost constant erosion of the power of the publisher to impact ad buys, even as his reach increases. The New York Times has 31 million online subscribers, a number unheard of in the print era. But to an advertiser, that could be nothing compared to a Google or a Facebook, who reach billions.
To survive in the programmatic environment, publishers have had to drop their CPMs. from double to single digits. The survivors have already made the shift, and the new startups are unburdened by legacy cost structures (you may remember printing presses).
Yet there are still ways for legacy publishers to survive the commoditization of what appears to be an infinite supply of inventory.
One way is through video ads. There is a relatively small supply of pre-roll to run against video content, and it is so limited that advertisers who want to run on video sites can’t get the reach they need without resorting to other forms of publication to get enough scale. On the other hand, video is increasingly popular with consumers, who watch it on mobile devices in ever-increasing numbers.
Advertisers who want to run video to reach large audiences must find other sites.
On these sites, smart publishers can either create content specific to advertisers , which we think of as content marketing, or allow advertisers to develop their own content to fit the existing content of the publisher, which is called native advertising. With either native advertising or content marketing, the simplest thing for an advertiser is to be able to repurpose existing TV ad content into a standard IAB space.
However, there’s still no guarantee that the ad will be seen, as the statistics say that 50% of video ads go unwatched.
We have the answer to this problem with ZINC’s InArticle video format, which runs on your site in a standard IAB unit, but gets 25% higher CTRs than a typical video ad because it can expand to full screen and leaves a 1×1 reminder at the bottom of the page.
Our InArticle format, sold directly or programmatically, allows advertisers to reach new audiences across new channels at scale. Our publisher partners have been very satisfied with the high CPMS this format is able to command, and advertisers are thrilled with our viewability metrics. We’ve got first rate video ad viewability partners who help our publisher partners provide the metrics they need to sell successfully.
Amidst all the fuss about cookies and whether advertisers would survive with new regulations surrounding the use of third party cookies, Facebook has developed a demand-side platform that can target customers totally without cookies. Not only that, but this platform can target a customer on or off Facebook, on mobile or desktop, and on any device. Facebook will release the platform, which is called Atlas, at NYC Advertising Week.
The targeting is done through Facebook’s own data. For instance, if a customer buys something in a brick and mortar store and gives an email address, if that address is in any way associated with a Facebook account, that purchase can be used can be used by Facebook to help assign the customer to the right categories for contextual ads. Bidders for advertising on RTB platforms and exchanges now have a flexible tool with which they can set their parameters according to how valuable a customer could be to them. For other media companies besides Facebook and Google, this would also be a blessing.
Atlas is a step away from cookies, but it might be a step to something much more invasive, and we’ve heard that Google is also working on something like this. While Facebook had revenues last quarter of $2.3 billion, Google had closer to $14 billion, and Facebook would love to catch up. Because we’ve been in this business a long time, we know that questions will be raised about privacy, mostly by people who remember growing up in an era where we actually had some. It is thought that younger people who have grown up with Facebook and other social networks that harvest personal data will have fewer concerns about the lengths to which advertisers will go to find their customers. We already see this as consumers get up in arms regularly about data breaches, but do not unplug from networks or sites that harvest personal data.
Consumers do say that they wouldn’t mind trading their information for truly contextual ads, since what’s happening right now is — according to anecdotal evidence, decidedly lacking. Who hasn’t bought a pair of shoes online from Zappo’s and been followed all over the web by ads for the shoes you just bought or some just like them? Retargeting is first generation context. What if instead you were targeted